Title of article :
Vertical integration to avoid contracting with potential competitors: Evidence from bankersʹ banks
Author/Authors :
Brickley، نويسنده , , James A. and Linck، نويسنده , , James S. and Smith، نويسنده , , Clifford W.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Abstract :
We examine a vertical integration decision within the commercial banking industry. During the last quarter of the 20th century, some community banks reduced their traditional reliance on correspondent banks for upstream products and services by joining bankersʹ banks, a form of business cooperative. Research on vertical integration focuses primarily on firm-specific investment, market power, and government regulation. However, this case is difficult to explain in terms of these standard vertical integration motives. Our evidence suggests that bankersʹ banks are a response to technological change and deregulation that results in increased costs faced by community banks in dealing with correspondent banks as both suppliers and potential competitors. For instance, loan participations require sharing proprietary information about major loan customers, something a community bank would not want to provide to a potential competitor.
Keywords :
Riegle-Neal Act , Decision authority , Ownership incentives , agency theory , Location decisions , Interstate branching , Economics of organizations , Banking , Boundaries of the firm , Community banks
Journal title :
Journal of Financial Economics
Journal title :
Journal of Financial Economics