Title of article
Vertical integration to avoid contracting with potential competitors: Evidence from bankersʹ banks
Author/Authors
Brickley، نويسنده , , James A. and Linck، نويسنده , , James S. and Smith، نويسنده , , Clifford W.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Pages
18
From page
113
To page
130
Abstract
We examine a vertical integration decision within the commercial banking industry. During the last quarter of the 20th century, some community banks reduced their traditional reliance on correspondent banks for upstream products and services by joining bankersʹ banks, a form of business cooperative. Research on vertical integration focuses primarily on firm-specific investment, market power, and government regulation. However, this case is difficult to explain in terms of these standard vertical integration motives. Our evidence suggests that bankersʹ banks are a response to technological change and deregulation that results in increased costs faced by community banks in dealing with correspondent banks as both suppliers and potential competitors. For instance, loan participations require sharing proprietary information about major loan customers, something a community bank would not want to provide to a potential competitor.
Keywords
Riegle-Neal Act , Decision authority , Ownership incentives , agency theory , Location decisions , Interstate branching , Economics of organizations , Banking , Boundaries of the firm , Community banks
Journal title
Journal of Financial Economics
Serial Year
2012
Journal title
Journal of Financial Economics
Record number
2212379
Link To Document