Comparing the accuracy of four electronic apex locators for determining the minor diameter: An ex vivo study

Background/purpose rpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the minor apical diameter, as measured by the Root ZX II, Raypex 5, Propex, and ATR EndoPlus electronic apex locators (EALs). als and methods ected 40 extracted maxillary incisors and used the locator instruments to measure the distance from the coronal reference point to the file tip at the major diameter. We termed this the reference canal length (RCL). Files were stabilized in position with a flowable composite. We then shaved 4 mm from the apical region and took photographs of the canal termination at 64% magnification to visualize the minor diameter. The minor diameter length (MDL) was then calculated. s ements with Raypex 5 (15.22 ± 1.79 mm), Root ZX II (15.24 ± 1.73 mm), Propex (15.22 ± 1.76 mm) and ATR EndoPlus (15.27 ± 1.78 mm) were significantly smaller than the MDL (15.43 ± 1.75 mm) (P < 0.05). When measurements were evaluated to within ±0.5 mm, the MDL determination was 82.5% acceptable for the Root ZX II and the ATR EndoPlus, and was 85% acceptable for the Raypex 5 and the Propex. sion curacy of these instruments for detecting the minor diameter is acceptable for clinical practice.