Author/Authors :
Johnson، نويسنده , , K.C. and Durbin، نويسنده , , T.D. and Cocker III، نويسنده , , DR. PATRICK MILLER، نويسنده , , W.J. and Bishnu، نويسنده , , D.K. and Maldonado، نويسنده , , H. and Moynahan، نويسنده , , N. and Ensfield، نويسنده , , C. and Laroo، نويسنده , , C.A.، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
On-road comparisons were made between a mobile emissions laboratory (MEL) meeting federal standards and a portable emissions measurement system (PEMS). These comparisons were made over different conditions; including road grade, vibration, altitude, electric fields, and humidity with the PEMS mounted inside and outside of the tractorʹs cab. Brake-specific emissions were calculated to explore error differences between the MEL and PEMS during the Not-To-Exceed (NTE) engine operating zone. The PEMS brake-specific NOx (bsNOx) NTE emissions were biased high relative to the MEL and, in general, were about 8% of the 2007 in-use NTE NOx standard of 2.68 g kW−1 h−1 (2.0 g hp−1 h−1). The bsCO2 emissions for the PEMS were also consistently biased high relative to the MEL, with an average deviation of +4% ± 2%. NMHC and CO emissions were very low and typically less than 1% of the NTE threshold. This research was part of a comprehensive program to determine the “allowance” when PEMS are used for in-use compliance testing of heavy-duty diesel vehicles (HDDVs).
Keywords :
on-road , In-use , Heavy-duty diesel , Semtech DS , PEMS , Not-to-exceed (NTE)