Title of article
Undetected changes in visible stimuli influence subsequent decisions
Author/Authors
Laloyaux، نويسنده , , Cédric and Devue، نويسنده , , Christel and Doyen، نويسنده , , Stéphane and David، نويسنده , , Elodie and Cleeremans، نويسنده , , Axel، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Pages
11
From page
646
To page
656
Abstract
Change blindness—our inability to detect changes in a stimulus—occurs even when the change takes place gradually, without any disruption [Simons, D. J., Franconeri, S. L., & Reimer, R. L. (2000). Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption. Perception, 29(10), 1143–1154]. Such gradual changes are more difficult to detect than changes that involve a disruption. Using this method, David et al. [David, E., Laloyaux, C., Devue, C., & Cleeremans, A. (in press). Change blindness to gradual changes in facial expressions. Psychologica Belgica] recently showed substantial blindness to changes that involve facial expressions of emotion. In this experiment, we show that people who failed to detect any change in the displays were (1) nevertheless influenced by the changing information in subsequent recognition decisions about which facial expression they had seen, and (2) that their confidence in their decisions was lower after exposure to changing vs. static displays. The findings therefore support the notion that undetected changes that occur in highly salient stimuli may be causally efficacious and influence subsequent behavior. Implications concerning the nature of the representations associated with undetected changes are discussed.
Keywords
Consciousness , Change detection , Awareness , change blindness , Visual memory , Visual short-term memory , Visual awareness , Implicit change detection , Implicit perception
Journal title
Consciousness and Cognition
Serial Year
2008
Journal title
Consciousness and Cognition
Record number
2291068
Link To Document