Title of article :
Metacognition and change detection: Do lab and life really converge?
Author/Authors :
Smilek، نويسنده , , Daniel and Eastwood، نويسنده , , John D. and Reynolds، نويسنده , , Michael G. and Kingstone، نويسنده , , Alan، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Pages :
6
From page :
1056
To page :
1061
Abstract :
Studies of change blindness indicate that more intentional monitoring of changes is necessary to successfully detect changes as scene complexity increases. However, there have been conflicting reports as to whether people are aware of this relation between intention and successful change detection as scene complexity increases. Here we continue our dialogue with [Beck, M. R., Levin, D. T., & Angelone, B. (2007a). Change blindness blindness: Beliefs about the roles of intention and scene complexity in change detection. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 31–51; Beck, M. R., Levin, D. T., & Angelone, B. (2007b). Metacognitive errors in change detection: Lab and life converge. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 58–62] by reporting two experiments that show participants do in fact intuit that more intentional monitoring is needed to detect changes as scene complexity increases. We also discuss how this dialogue illustrates the need for psychological studies to be grounded in measurements taken from real world situations rather than laboratory experiments or questionnaires.
Keywords :
Driving , Metacognition , attention , change blindness , Intuitions , Change blindness blindness , Cognitive ethology
Journal title :
Consciousness and Cognition
Serial Year :
2008
Journal title :
Consciousness and Cognition
Record number :
2291127
Link To Document :
بازگشت