‘Apples’ and ‘oranges’: comparing the structural aspects of biomineral- and ice-interaction proteins

The title of this review describes structural comparisons of protein classes whose task is to identify and interact with biological solids (minerals and ice). To date, the following trends have been noted: (1) biomineral-interaction proteins typically adopt unfolded, open conformations, and, where mineral binding motifs have been identified, these sequences exhibit structural trends towards extended, random coil, or other unstable secondary structures; (2) ice-interaction proteins typically adopt folded structures, featuring stable secondary structure preferences (α-helix, β-sheet, β-helix, etc.) and stable, planar ice binding motifs that exploit hydrophobicity and van der Waals’ interactions for ice binding.