New indication for a dichotomy in the interior structure of Uranus and Neptune from the application of modified shape and rotation data

Since the Voyager fly-bys of Uranus and Neptune, improved gravity field data have been derived from long-term observations of the planetsʹ satellite motions, and modified shape and solid-body rotation periods were suggested. A faster rotation period (−40 min) for Uranus and a slower rotation period (+1h20) of Neptune compared to the Voyager data were found to minimize the dynamical heights and wind speeds. We apply the improved gravity data, the modified shape and rotation data, and the physical LM-R equation of state to compute adiabatic three-layer structure models, where rocks are confined to the core, and homogeneous thermal evolution models of Uranus and Neptune. We present the full range of structure models for both the Voyager and the modified shape and rotation data. In contrast to previous studies based solely on the Voyager data or on empirical EOS, we find that Uranus and Neptune may differ to an observationally significant level in their atmospheric heavy element mass fraction Z1 and nondimensional moment of inertia, λ . For Uranus, we find Z 1 ≤ 8 % and λ = 0.2224 ( 1 ) , while for Neptune Z 1 ≤ 65 % and λ = 0.2555 ( 2 ) when applying the modified shape and rotation data, while for the unmodified data we compute Z 1 ≤ 17 % and λ = 0.230 ( 1 ) for Uranus and Z 1 ≤ 54 % and λ = 0.2410 ( 8 ) for Neptune. In each of these cases, solar metallicity models ( Z 1 = 0.015 ) are still possible. The cooling times obtained for each planet are similar to recent calculations with the Voyager rotation periods: Neptuneʹs luminosity can be explained by assuming an adiabatic interior while Uranus cools far too slowly. More accurate determinations of these planetsʹ gravity fields, shapes, rotation periods, atmospheric heavy element abundances, and intrinsic luminosities are essential for improving our understanding of the internal structure and evolution of icy planets.