Author/Authors :
Roohafza، Hamidreza نويسنده Rehabilitation Research Center, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , , Sadeghi، Masoumeh نويسنده , , Khani، Azam نويسنده Research Assistant, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , , Afshar، Hamid نويسنده , , Amirpour، Afshin نويسنده Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , , Sarrafzadegan، Nizal نويسنده MD, Professor of Cardiology, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, IUMS, Isfahan , , Scheidt، Carl Eduard نويسنده Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany ,
Abstract :
BACKGROUND: The aim was to translate and develop a patient competence (PC) questionnaire
in the context of cardiology and test its validity and reliability.
METHODS: In total, 148 cardiac patients who have inclusion criteria of the study were completed
cardiac PC (CPC) questionnaire. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and self-administered
instrument European quality of life 5-dimensions were used to further validate the CPC
questionnaire. The CPC was translated according to the recommended methodology for
translating questionnaires, and psychometric properties including internal consistency, factor
analysis, discriminant validity, construct validity, and concurrent criterion validity were tested.
RESULTS: Five domains in problem-focused task including search for information, selfregulation,
being assertive, independent decision-making, and looking for social services, and
three domains in emotion-focused task including stress management, confronting the threat,
and avoidance were obtained by factor analysis. The standardized Cronbach’s ? of all domains
were statistically significant (P < 0.001) and internal consistency for all domains was acceptable.
Significant intercorrelations of CPC domains also indicated good criterion validity. As there
were no cross-loadings, the domains have demonstrated good construct validity and
discriminant validity.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the Persian version of the CPC is a reliable and
valid questionnaire. Although further improvement of this measure is clearly required, it
suggests being a potential basis for investigating the determinants and health effects of CPC.