Title of article :
Effect of Preheating and Precooling on the Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Nanohybrid and Silorane-based Composite
Author/Authors :
Sharafeddin ، Farahnaz نويسنده Dept. of Operative Dentistry, Biomaterials Research Center, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. , , Motamedi ، Mehran نويسنده Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Science. Shiraz, Iran , , Fattah، Zahra نويسنده School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 3 Suppl سال 2015
Pages :
6
From page :
224
To page :
229
Abstract :
Statement of the Problem: Composite resin may be used in different temperatures; it is crucial to determine the effect of temperature on mechanical properties of nanohybrid and silorane-based composite. Purpose: This in vitro study compared the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of nanohybrid and silorane-based resin composite, at 4?C, room temperature (25?C), and 45?C. Materials and Method: In this experimental study, 60 specimens were prepared in a metal split mold (2×2×25mm). Two different resin composites, Filtek Z250 XT (3M/ ESPE) and Filtek P90 (3M/ESPE), were evaluated. The material were inserted into split molds at room temperature, 4?C or 45?C and cured with LED (1200 mW/cm2) for 20 seconds in four points (n=10). Then, a three-point bending test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min for measuring the flexural strength and flexural modulus of samples. The data were analyzed by the two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p < 0.05). Results: The mean highest flexural strength was observed at 45?C, showing statistically significant difference with flexural strength at 4?C (p= 0.0001) and 25?C (p= 0.003) regardless of the type of resin composite. The flexural modulus at 45?C was highest, showing the statistically significant difference with flexural modulus at 4?C (p= 0.0001) and 25?C (p= 0.002). The flexural modulus was statistically different between nanohybrid and silorane-based resin composite (p= 0.01) in 25?C and 45?C, but there were no statistically significant differences between flexural strength of Filtek Z250 XT and Filtek P90 regardless of the temperatures (p= 0.062). Conclusion: Preheating the resin composite at 45?C improves flexural strength and modulus of nanohybrid and silorane-based resin composite. However, flexural strength and modulus of the tested materials were not affected by precooling. The flexural modulus of nanohybrid resin composite was significantly higher than silorane-based resin composite in 25?C and 45?C temperatures.
Journal title :
Journal of Dentistry :Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Serial Year :
2015
Journal title :
Journal of Dentistry :Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Record number :
2317003
Link To Document :
بازگشت