Author/Authors :
Lührs، نويسنده , , Anne-Katrin and Gِrmann، نويسنده , , Barbara and Jacker-Guhr، نويسنده , , Silke and Geurtsen، نويسنده , , Werner، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Objectives
the study was the investigation of the repairability of a silorane (Filtek Silorane, 3M Espe, Seefeld, Germany) after different surface pretreatments in vitro.
s
orane specimens (5 mm × 5 mm × 5 mm) were fabricated and stored in saline solution (24 h/37 °C). Their surface was polished with abrasive paper (600 grit), etched with phosphoric acid (10 s) and rinsed with water (30 s). Repair was performed with a silorane based on one of the 9 treatment protocols (each n = 6): no additional treatment (NAT), silorane primer (P) and silorane bond (B), B only, sandblasting (SB), SB plus P/B, SB plus B, CoJet and silane (CJ), CJ plus P/B, CJ plus B. Whole silorane specimens (5 mm × 5 mm × 10 mm) with no repair served as control. Specimens were sectioned and microtensile bond strength (μTBS) was measured (30 beams per group, surface area approx. 1.2 mm2, crosshead-speed 1 mm/min) statistical analysis (ANOVA, Tukey HSD, p < 0.05) was performed.
s
f the specimens was significantly influenced by the surface pretreatment (p < 0.001). The highest μTBS was determined for CJ/B and SB/B, which were not significantly different from the control. NAT, SB and CJ benefited from an additional treatment with B (p < 0.01). The additional use of P did not improve μTBS, but was detrimental for the SB and CJ groups (p < 0.05).
icance
nes can be repaired with either SB or CJ in combination with a silorane bond, the additional use of silorane primer is disadvantageous.
Keywords :
Silorane , Repair , CoJet , silane , Surface Pretreatment , Sandblasting