Author/Authors :
Samad-Zadeh، نويسنده , , Arman and Harsono، نويسنده , , Masly and Belikov، نويسنده , , Andrey and Shatilova، نويسنده , , Ksenia V. and Skripnik، نويسنده , , Alexey and Stark، نويسنده , , Paul and Egles، نويسنده , , Christophe and Kugel، نويسنده , , Gerard، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Objective
ess the influence of laser-textured surfaces on the adhesion of composite to dentin after being rotary prepared.
s
healthy teeth were kept in 0.1% thymol solution prior to being ground down to dentin to create a 4 × 4 mm2 flat surface. Teeth were divided into 3 groups (n = 10). Groups 1 and 2 utilized the prototype Erbium doped, Yttrium–Aluminum–Garnet Er:YAG laser by Dental Photonics, Inc. A single pulse was delivered to each spot to create an equally spaced square 4 × 4 mm2 matrix of micro craters. All craters had 100 μm diameter/45 μm depth; two different spacing patterns were prepared in Groups 1 and 2. In Group 1, distance between crater centers was 50 μm; Group 2 had 100 μm. In Group 3 (control), 10 samples were prepared without laser texturing. G-bond (GC America) was applied to testing area of all samples in all groups according to manufacturerʹs instructions. Bonding resin was applied and shear-bond strength tests were employed using an Instron machine to measure adhesive strength.
s
y analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the 3 groups. Pair wise t-tests implementing the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons found a statistically significant difference between Group 3 and Group 2 (p = 0.019) but no statistically significant difference between Group 3 and Group 1 (p = 0.263) or Group 1 and Group 2 (p = 0.743).
icance
nd strengths between bonded composite to laser-textured dentinal surfaces with larger spacing patterns are greater than that of non-textured surfaces.
Keywords :
Adhesion , Dental adhesive , Composite resin , Dentin , lasers , Bond strength , Cavity preparation