Author/Authors :
Kassogue، Yaya نويسنده Genetics and Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Medical School of Casablanca, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco , , Dehbi، Hind نويسنده Genetics and Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Medical School of Casablanca, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco , , Quachouh، Meryem نويسنده Department of Onco-Hematology, Ibn Rochd University Hospital, Casablanca, Morocco , , Quessar، Asma نويسنده Department of Onco-Hematology, Ibn Rochd University Hospital, Casablanca, Morocco , , Benchekroun، Said نويسنده Department of Onco-Hematology, Ibn Rochd University Hospital, Casablanca, Morocco , , Nadifi، Sellama نويسنده Genetics and Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Medical School of Casablanca, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco ,
Abstract :
Background: Despite the impressive results obtained with imatinib, inadequate
response or resistance are observed in certain patients. It is known that imatinib is a
substrate of a multidrug resistance gene (MDR1). Thus, interindividual genetic
differences linked to single nucleotide polymorphisms in MDR1 may influence the
metabolism of imatinib. The present study has aimed to examine the impact of MDR1
polymorphisms on the hematologic and cytogenetic responses in 70 chronic myeloid
leukemia patients who received imatinib.
Methods: We used a polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction fragment
length polymorphism to identify different profiles of 1236C > T, 2677G > T and 3435C > T
in MDR1.
Results: The distribution of the three SNPs in responders and poor responders did
not show any particular trend (P > 0.05). The T allele was slightly higher in responders,
but not significantly regardless of the type of SNP (40.3% vs. 33.8% for 1236C > T; 25%
vs. 14.7% for 2677G > T and 33.3% vs. 22% for 3435C > T). The dominant model
showed a similar trend (P > 0.05). Diplotypes composed by the T allele in different exons
were frequent in responders. Haplotype analysis showed that 1236C-2677G-3435C was
slightly higher in poor responders (60.02%) compared to responders (50.42%).
However, 1236T-2677T-3435T was frequent in responders (16.98%) compared to
poor responders (13.1%). Overall, none of the haplotypes were associated with IM
response in our cohort (global haplotype association test, P=0.39).
Conclusion: The identification of 1236C > T, 2677G > T and 3435C > T polymorphisms
may not be advantageous to predict imatinib response for our chronic myeloid leukemia
patients.