Title of article :
Young eclogite from the Greater Himalayan Sequence, Arun Valley, eastern Nepal: P–T–t path and tectonic implications
Author/Authors :
Corrie، نويسنده , , S.L. and Kohn، نويسنده , , M.J. and Vervoort، نويسنده , , J.D.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
Pages :
11
From page :
406
To page :
416
Abstract :
Garnet geochronology was used to provide the first direct measurement of the timing of eclogitization in the central Himalaya. Lu–Hf dates from garnet separates in one relict eclogite from the Arun River Valley in eastern Nepal indicate an age of 20.7 ± 0.4 Ma, significantly younger than ultra-high pressure eclogites from the western Himalaya, reflecting either different origins or substantial time lags in tectonics along strike. Four proximal garnet amphibolites from structurally lower horizons are 14–15 Ma, similar to post-eclogitization ages published for rocks along strike in southern Tibet. P–T calculations indicate three metamorphic episodes for the eclogite: i) eclogite-facies metamorphism at ∼ 670 °C and ≥ 15 kbar at 23–16 Ma; ii) a peak-T granulite event at ∼ 780 °C and 12 kbar; and iii) late-stage amphibolite-facies metamorphism at ∼ 675 °C and 6 kbar at ∼ 14 Ma. The garnet amphibolites were metamorphosed at ∼ 660 °C. Three models are considered to explain the observed P–T–t evolution. The first assumes that the Main Himalayan Thrust (basal thrust of the Himalayan thrust system) cuts deeper at Arun than elsewhere. While conceptually the simplest, this model has difficulty explaining both the granulite-facies overprint and the pulse of exhumation between 25 and 14 Ma. A second model assumes that (aborted) subduction, slab breakoff, and ascent of Indiaʹs leading edge occurred diachronously: ∼ 50 Ma in the western Himalaya, ∼ 25 Ma in the central Himalaya of Nepal, and presumably later in the eastern Himalaya. This model explains the P–T–t path, particularly heating during initial exhumation, but implies significant along-strike diachroneity, which is generally lacking in other features of the Himalaya. A third model assumes repeated loss of mantle lithosphere, first by slab breakoff at ∼ 50 Ma, and again by delamination at ∼ 25 Ma; this model explains the P–T–t path, but requires geographically restricted tectonic behavior at Arun. The P–T–t history of the Arun eclogites may imply a change in the physical state of the Himalayan metamorphic wedge at 16–25 Ma, ultimately giving rise to the Main Central Thrust by 15–16 Ma.
Keywords :
garnet , himalaya , Nepal , metamorphism , eclogite
Journal title :
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Serial Year :
2010
Journal title :
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Record number :
2327932
Link To Document :
بازگشت