• Title of article

    Some contraindications of hole expansion in riveted joints

  • Author/Authors

    Boni، نويسنده , , L. and Lanciotti، نويسنده , , A. and Polese، نويسنده , , C.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
  • Pages
    17
  • From page
    140
  • To page
    156
  • Abstract
    Comparable fatigue tests were carried out on aluminium alloy 7475-T7351 double butt joints with untreated and with cold expanded holes. Surprisingly, the behaviour of the specimens having cold expanded holes was worse than that of specimens with untreated holes. This result was attributed to the surface upset which was present in cold expanded holes. Several hypotheses were formulated and experimentally verified to overcome this problem, such as deeper hole deburring, rivet diameter, joint design and grip material, steel instead of aluminium alloy. onal tests demonstrated that the problem was not present in sealed joint as the surface upset was hidden in the sealant thickness. Sealants have detrimental effects in the fatigue resistance of riveted joints, as they increase the load transferred by rivet bearing. The hole expansion is beneficial in this condition, while in un-sealed joints its effect must be accurately evaluated. authors too highlighted possible problems due to surface upset, up to suggest to eliminate it. Only in a very few cases, a reduction of fatigue life as a consequence of hole expansion was observed.
  • Keywords
    Riveted lap joints , Fatigue , Split sleeve cold working
  • Journal title
    Engineering Failure Analysis
  • Serial Year
    2014
  • Journal title
    Engineering Failure Analysis
  • Record number

    2340419