Title of article :
PSHA: is it science?
Author/Authors :
Castaٌos، نويسنده , , Heriberta and Lomnitz، نويسنده , , Jean Pierre Cinna، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Abstract :
Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) is beginning to be seen as unreliable. The problem with PSHA is that its data are inadequate and its logic is defective. Much more reliable, and more scientific, are deterministic procedures, especially when coupled with engineering judgment.
Keywords :
earthquakes , Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis , Deterministic seismic hazard analysis
Journal title :
Engineering Geology
Journal title :
Engineering Geology
