Title of article :
Assessing sentence scoring techniques for extractive text summarization
Author/Authors :
Ferreira، نويسنده , , Rafael and de Souza Cabral، نويسنده , , Luciano and Lins، نويسنده , , Rafael Dueire and Pereira e Silva، نويسنده , , Gabriel Falconieri Freitas، نويسنده , , Fred and Cavalcanti، نويسنده , , George D.C. and Lima، نويسنده , , Rinaldo and Simske، نويسنده , , Steven J. and Favaro، نويسنده , , Luciano، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages :
10
From page :
5755
To page :
5764
Abstract :
Text summarization is the process of automatically creating a shorter version of one or more text documents. It is an important way of finding relevant information in large text libraries or in the Internet. Essentially, text summarization techniques are classified as Extractive and Abstractive. Extractive techniques perform text summarization by selecting sentences of documents according to some criteria. Abstractive summaries attempt to improve the coherence among sentences by eliminating redundancies and clarifying the contest of sentences. In terms of extractive summarization, sentence scoring is the technique most used for extractive text summarization. This paper describes and performs a quantitative and qualitative assessment of 15 algorithms for sentence scoring available in the literature. Three different datasets (News, Blogs and Article contexts) were evaluated. In addition, directions to improve the sentence extraction results obtained are suggested.
Keywords :
Extractive summarization , Sentence scoring methods , Summarization evaluation
Journal title :
Expert Systems with Applications
Serial Year :
2013
Journal title :
Expert Systems with Applications
Record number :
2353865
Link To Document :
بازگشت