• Title of article

    Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry

  • Author/Authors

    Anojkumar، نويسنده , , L. and Ilangkumaran، نويسنده , , M. and Sasirekha، نويسنده , , V.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
  • Pages
    17
  • From page
    2964
  • To page
    2980
  • Abstract
    The material plays an important role in an engineering design process. The suitable material selection for a particular product is one of the vital tasks for the designers. In order to fulfil the product’s end requirements, designers need to analyze the performance of various materials and spot suitable materials with precise functionalities. Due to the presence of large number of materials with diverse properties, the material selection process is complicated and time consuming task. There is a necessity of systematic and efficient approach towards material selection to choose best alternative material for a product. The aim of this paper is to describe the application of four Multi Criteria Decision Making methods for solving pipes material selection problem in sugar industry. FAHP-TOPSIS, FAHP-VIKOR, FAHP-ELECTRE, FAHP-PROMTHEE are the four methods used to choose the best alternative among the various materials. The ranking performance of various MCDM methods is also compared with each other and exploring the effectiveness and flexibility of VIKOR method. Five stainless steel grades such as J4, JSLAUS, J204Cu, 409 M, 304 and seven evaluation criteria such as yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, percentage of elongation, hardness, cost, corrosion rate and wear rate are focussed in this study to choose the suitable material.
  • Keywords
    VIKOR , ELECTRE , Material selection , PROMETHEE , Corrosion , WEAR , FAHP , TOPSIS
  • Journal title
    Expert Systems with Applications
  • Serial Year
    2014
  • Journal title
    Expert Systems with Applications
  • Record number

    2354602