Title of article :
Comparing physiographic maps with different categorisations
Author/Authors :
Zawadzka، نويسنده , , J. and Mayr، نويسنده , , T. and Bellamy، نويسنده , , P. and Corstanje، نويسنده , , R.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2015
Abstract :
This paper addresses the need for a robust map comparison method suitable for finding similarities between thematic maps with different forms of categorisations. In our case, the requirement was to establish the information content of newly derived physiographic maps with regards to set of reference maps for a study area in England and Wales. Physiographic maps were derived from the 90 m resolution SRTM DEM, using a suite of existing and new digital landform mapping methods with the overarching purpose of enhancing the physiographic unit component of the Soil and Terrain database (SOTER). Reference maps were seven soil and landscape datasets mapped at scales ranging from 1:200,000 to 1:5,000,000. A review of commonly used statistical methods for categorical comparisons was performed and of these, the Cramer’s V statistic was identified as the most appropriate for comparison of maps with different legends. Interpretation of multiple Cramer’s V values resulting from one-by-one comparisons of the physiographic and baseline maps was facilitated by multi-dimensional scaling and calculation of average distances between the maps. The method allowed for finding similarities and dissimilarities amongst physiographic maps and baseline maps and informed the recommendation of the most suitable methodology for terrain analysis in the context of soil mapping.
Keywords :
Map comparison , Cramer’s V , Physiographic mapping , Landform mapping
Journal title :
Geomorphology
Journal title :
Geomorphology