Title of article :
Component lifetime comparison and waste volume in CLiFF Sn/Flibe and Sn/LiPb blankets
Author/Authors :
Youssef، نويسنده , , M.Z. and Sawan، نويسنده , , M.E، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Abstract :
The thin Convective Liquid Flow First Wall (CLiFF) concept is one of the liquid FW concepts investigated in the Advanced Power Extraction (APEX) study for high power density application. Liquid tin has been suggested as the 2 cm thick front flowing liquid layer because of its low vapor pressure. Two choices were selected for the conventional blanket that follows the thin liquid wall (LW), namely: (1) LiPb/SiC blanket, and (2) Flibe/SiC blanket. Lithium is enriched to 90% Li-6 in the first blanket option and to 25% Li-6 in the second option (with 10 cm-thick beryllium front zone). Due to the superior attenuation characteristics of Flibe over LiPb, this impacted the lifetime of the SiC structure used in both options. In this paper, we assessed the lifetime of the SiC structure in the FW/Blanket and the shield in both blanket options. The end-of-life limit of 200 dpa is assumed (corresponding to ∼3% burn-up). The frequency of replacement of each component is estimated based on 30-years plant lifetime. Comparison is made for the waste volume of replaced components in each option. It is shown that the shield can last the plant lifetime in the Flibe blanket while part of the shield in the LiPb blanket will require replacement. The frequency of replacing the FW/Blanket with the LiPb blanket option is twice as much as in the Flibe blanket option. This is translated to a total volume of disposed structure at plant end-of-life from the entire FW/B/shield system that is larger by ∼60%.
Keywords :
Advanced power extraction , Sn/LiPb , Waste volume , Structure lifetime , CLiFF Sn/Flibe
Journal title :
Fusion Engineering and Design
Journal title :
Fusion Engineering and Design