Title of article :
Comparative study of iron(III) separation from zinc sulphate–sulphuric acid solutions using organophosphorus extractants, OPAP and D2EHPA: Part II. Stripping
Author/Authors :
Principe، نويسنده , , F. and Demopoulos، نويسنده , , G.P.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Abstract :
Iron(III) solvent extraction removal from zinc process solutions by OPAP (octylphenyl acid phosphate) and D2EHPA (di-(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid) was studied from the standpoint of stripping with HCl such that a saleable waste-free iron product could be generated downstream using existing pyrohydrolysis technology. OPAP (0.95 F) at 20 °C was found to be an excellent extractant for the preparation of concentrated iron chloride strip solutions. Its major advantages included very low sulphate carry-over, reasonable zinc carry-over, very low chloride back-extraction, and economic iron build-up and acid balance when a ‘moderate strength’ HCl–FeCl2 strip feed (3.38 N HCl–58.5 g/L Fe(II)–9.7 g/L Fe(III)) was used. Major drawbacks with D2EHPA were identified which included significant sulphate carry-over and ineffective stripping and hence, poor iron build-up (≪ 100 g/L) with the ‘moderate strength’ strip feed. OPAP exhibited lower chloride back-extraction than D2EHPA. High molar ratio values of back-extracted chloride and unstripped iron(III) suggest a predominance of Fe(III)–chloro complexes in D2EHPA. OPAP stripping with 4 N HNO3 at 50 °C was found to be ineffective.
Keywords :
Zinc process solutions , Stripping , Iron (III) separation
Journal title :
HYDROMETALLURGY
Journal title :
HYDROMETALLURGY