Small-scale dust structures in Halleyʹs coma: II. Disintegration of large dust bodies

Small-scale dust structures, SDSs, altogether ∼35 events with extent ∼30–220 km, have been recognized owing to electric field records, mostly near the closest approach of Vega-2 to Halleyʹs nucleus. Several (8–9) morphological forms of SDS have been identified, and all they make one family. Among the family members, the key form (with respect to which, all other forms can be regarded as degenerate) is a sequence of 3–5 dust clouds. The morphological forms represent various Vega-2 passes through SDSs at different stages of development. SDSs observable as the key form consisted of several fairly regularly spaced dust subpopulations, whose plane of symmetry was parallel to the comet orbit plane. That regularity together with specific features of morphological forms strongly constrain disintegration scenarios and dynamics of fragments, and allow to draw a number of conclusions, the main of which are: SDS parent bodies were ice-free dust aggregates lifted from the nucleus near the comet perihelion, whose masses were in the range ∼0.1–1 of the biggest emitted mass (mass of a body accelerated to the escape velocity, i.e., ∼300–1500 kg); the disintegration scenario comprised a few steps, and the first-step disintegration consisted mainly in consecutive detachments of biggest first-step fragments (BF-SFs) from the parent body; a SDS observable as the key form included the dust minitail of parent body and a few BF-SF minitails, the former one being longer than the latter ones; SDS parent bodies had a fractal-like internal structure, and the BF-SF mass was a few percent of the parent body mass; the thermal conductivity of SDS parent body was less than ∼0.4 W m−1 K−1 or so, while the latent heat of gluing organics was roughly 80 kJ mol−1; the disintegration mechanism was a combination of sintering and sublimation of organics. The multistep disintegration of SDS parent bodies can be reconciled with the basically one-step disintegration of aggregates responsible for the dust boundary (Oberc, P., Icarus 1996, 124, 195–208). The fractal-like structure and the relation between BF-SF mass and parent body mass are in agreement with predictions from the Weidenschilling model of comet formation. Large ice-free dust bodies, in particular SDS parent bodies, can be identified with refractory boulders postulated by some comet nucleus models.