Title of article :
A Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma Performed by Emergency Medicine and Radiology Residents
Author/Authors :
Zamani، s. Majid نويسنده , , Masoumi، Babak نويسنده Department of Emergency Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , , Esmailian، Mehrdad نويسنده Department of Emergency Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , , Habibi، Amin نويسنده Education Development Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran , , Khazaei، Mehdi نويسنده Sharif University of Technology, Electrical Engineering Faculty , , Mohammadi Esfahani، Mohammad نويسنده Department of Emergency Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2015
Pages :
1
From page :
0
To page :
0
Abstract :
Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) is a method for prompt detection of the abdominal free fluid in patients with abdominal trauma. This study was conducted to compare the diagnostic accuracy of FAST performed by emergency medicine residents (EMR) and radiology residents (RRs) in detecting peritoneal free fluids. Patients triaged in the emergency department with blunt abdominal trauma, high energy trauma, and multiple traumas underwent a FAST examination by EMRs and RRs with the same techniques to obtain the standard views. Ultrasound findings for free fluid in peritoneal cavity for each patient (positive/negative) were compared with the results of computed tomography, operative exploration, or observation as the final outcome. A total of 138 patients were included in the final analysis. Good diagnostic agreement was noted between the results of FAST scans performed by EMRs and RRs (? = 0.701, P < 0.001), also between the results of EMRs-performed FAST and the final outcome (? = 0.830, P < 0.0010), and finally between the results of RRs-performed FAST and final outcome (? = 0.795, P < 0.001). No significant differences were noted between EMRs- and RRs-performed FASTs regarding sensitivity (84.6% vs 84.6%), specificity (98.4% vs 97.6%), positive predictive value (84.6% vs 84.6%), and negative predictive value (98.4% vs 98.4%). Trained EMRs like their fellow RRs have the ability to perform FAST scan with high diagnostic value in patients with blunt abdominal trauma
Journal title :
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal
Serial Year :
2015
Journal title :
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal
Record number :
2386929
Link To Document :
بازگشت