Author/Authors :
Madhavarao Biradar، Sharashchandra نويسنده 1Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Manasarovar Dental College and Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh , , Satyanarayan، Ashok نويسنده Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, MIDSR Dental College Hospital and Research Centre, Latur, Maharashtra , , J Kulkarni، Arun نويسنده 2Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, MIDSR Dental College Hospital and Research Centre, Latur, Maharashtra , , Patti، Basavaraj نويسنده Department of Public Health Dentistry, DJ College of Dental Sciences and Research, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh , , Mysore، Sunil K نويسنده Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Guru Nanak Dev Dental College and Research Institute, Sunam, Sangrur District, Punjab , , Patil، Ambika نويسنده Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Albadar-Dental College and Hospital Research Centre, Gulbarga, Karnarka ,
Abstract :
Background: Coronally advanced fl ap (CAF) has been shown to effectively treat gingival recession.
Platelet rich plasma (PRP), containing autologous growth factors, has been shown to promote soft
tissue healing. The aim of this clinical study was to determine whether the addition of an autologous
PRP to a CAF when compared to a CAF alone would improve the clinical outcome for treatment
of multiple gingival recessions.
Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with Miller’s class I and class II buccal recession defect were
randomly assigned to control (CAF alone) or test (CAF with PRP) groups. Recession depth (RD),
recession width (RW), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), width of keratinized tissue,
wound healing index, percentage of root coverage was assessed. Patients were followed at 2, 4, 12
and 16 weeks post-surgery. Statistical analysis for intra and inter group comparisons was done using
Wilcoxon sign rank and Wilcoxon rank sum tests respectively. P < 0.05 denoted statistical signifi cance.
Results: The differences between the test and control groups were not signifi cant with respect
to all the clinical variables. The RD at 16 weeks was signifi cantly reduced from 2.88 ± 0.69 to
0.76 ± 0.24 mm in control group (P < 0.05) and from 2.95 ± 0.43 to 0.76 ± 0.35 mm in the test
group (P < 0.05). The mean percentage of root coverage was 73.1 ± 7.3 in the control group and
75.0 ± 8.3 in test group (P < 0.05). The CAL gain was 3.17 ± 0.84 mm within the control group
and 3.17 ± 0.79 mm within test group.
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, PRP with CAF can provide an early healing of
soft tissues, but does not provide clinically measurable improvement in the fi nal therapeutics
outcome in CAF.