Title of article :
Reliability and Validity of the Farsi Version of the Somatosensory Amplification Scale
Author/Authors :
Aghayousefi، Alireza نويسنده , , Oraki، Mohammad نويسنده Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, IR Iran , , Mohammadi، Narges نويسنده Psychosomatic Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran , , Farzad، Valiyollah نويسنده Department of Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, IR Iran , , Daghaghzadeh، Hammed نويسنده Integrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 1 سال 2015
Pages :
1
From page :
0
To page :
0
Abstract :
Background: The somatosensory amplification scale (SSAS) is a 10-item self-report instrument designed to assess a tendency to experience normal somatic and visceral sensations as intense, noxious, and disturbing. Objectives: The present study investigated the reliability and validity of the SSAS, developed by Barsky et al. (1988), in the Iranian population. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out on 240 patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders and 30 healthy persons selected by convenience sampling from 2013 to 2014. The patients completed the SSAS, the somatization subscale of the symptom checklist-90-revised (SCL-90-R som), and the modified somatic perception questionnaire (MSPQ), whereas the healthy persons completed just the SSAS. Results: Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the one-factor solution, accounting for 29.42% of the variance, explained that the SSAS items were represented by one global dimension. The SSAS had acceptable internal consistency (? = 0.78) and good test-retest reliability (r = 0.80). The item-to-scale correlations varied from 0.17 to 0.55. Item 2 had the lowest item-total score correlation (r = 0.17), and the ? coefficient for the SSAS exceeded when this item was deleted. The convergent validity of the SSAS with somatization was shown with a significant correlation between the SSAS, SCL-90-R som (r = 0.36), and MSPQ scores (r = 0.52). Discriminant validity analysis showed no significant difference in the SSAS between the patient and control groups (P > 0.05) and non-specificity of the SSAS for patients. Conclusions: In sum, the SSAS has acceptable reliability and validity for the Iranian population and the scale measures the same the original scale, namely somatosensory amplification.
Journal title :
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (IJPBS)
Serial Year :
2015
Journal title :
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (IJPBS)
Record number :
2387737
Link To Document :
بازگشت