Title of article :
The minimum thickness of a multilayer porcelain restoration required for masking severe tooth discoloration
Author/Authors :
Shadman، Niloofar نويسنده Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Medical Science, Kerman, Iran , , Gorji Kandi، Saeideh نويسنده Department of Polymer Engineering and Color Technology, Faculty of Color Technology , , Farzin Ebrahimi، Shahram نويسنده Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center , , Azizi Shoul، Maryam نويسنده Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, ,
Issue Information :
دوفصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2015
Abstract :
Background: Although studies have shown that porcelain veneers are very effi cient for treating
discolored teeth, they did not address in particular the minimum thickness of a multilayer IPS e.max
Press (IvoclarVivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) restoration required to mask discolored tooth. The
aim of this study was to determine the minimum thickness of a multilayer porcelain restoration
required for masking severe tooth discoloration.
Materials and Methods: A total of 24 disk-shaped multilayer specimens were prepared from IPS
e.max Press with the diameter of 13 mm and four different thicknesses (core/veneer: 0.4/0.4 mm,
0.5/0.5 mm, 0.6/0.6 mm and 0.8/0.7 mm). Two backgrounds, C4-shade body porcelain and an opaque
background from the selected IPS e.max ceramic itself were fabricated to mimic a discolored or
stained natural tooth structure and to determine the masking ability. After applying the resin cement
layer (Panavia F2.0) with 0.01 mm thickness on each background, all specimens were measured
on both background using a spectrophotometer and values of L*, a* and b* were calculated to
determine the color differences (?? *
ab). One-way ANOVA and post-hoc tests of specimen average
one-to-one comparison (Tukey HSD) were conducted and P ? 0.05 was set as the level of signifi cance.
Results: ??*
ab of all groups were within the range of the clinically acceptable color difference (?E ?3.3), thus
all the groups could mask the C4 background even group 1 with only 0.8 mm thickness. A trend was shown
in the results as by increasing the thickness, ??*
ab is was decreased. The mean ??*
1*a*b between different
thicknesses were statistically signifi cant (P < 0.05) only between group 4 with groups 1 and 2, respectively.
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, all studied thicknesses could mask the C4
background. However, the minimum thickness of a multilayer porcelain restoration (IPS e.max
Press) required for masking severe tooth discoloration was 0.8 mm
Journal title :
DRJ Dental Research Journal
Journal title :
DRJ Dental Research Journal