Title of article :
Hepatitis D Virus Infection Among Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Carriers and in “Isolated anti-HBc” Antibodies Profile in Central Tunisia
Author/Authors :
Mhalla، Salma نويسنده Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology, F. Hached Teaching Hospital, (UR12SP34) University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia , , Kadri، Yosr نويسنده Department of Microbiology, Fattouma Bourguiba Teaching Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia , , Alibi، Sana نويسنده Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology, F. Hached Teaching Hospital, (UR12SP34) University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia , , Letaief، Amel نويسنده Department of Infectious Disease, F. Hached Teaching Hospital, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia , , Boukadida، Jalel نويسنده Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology, F. Hached Teaching Hospital, (UR12SP34) University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia , , Hannachi، Naila نويسنده Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology, F. Hached Teaching Hospital, (UR12SP34) University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2016
Pages :
5
From page :
1
To page :
5
Abstract :
Hepatitis D Virus (HDV) causes accelerated liver diseases in patients with Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) infection. There is lack of data about its prevalence, related risk factors and interaction with HBV carriers in our country. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of hepatitis delta and associated risk factors among Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and “isolated anti-HBc” profile carriers in central Tunisia. In this cross-sectional study, 540 patients with positive HBsAg and 109 “isolated anti-HBc” profile receiving care in a teaching hospital were tested for the presence of HDV serum-markers using commercially available enzyme immunoassay kit. HBV-DNA was detected by nested PCR in “isolated anti-HBc” profile group. Prevalence of HDV was 8.1% in HBsAg carriers group, but it was significantly higher in active than inactive hepatitis (30.2% and 4.5%, respectively, OR = 9, 95% CI: [4.48-18.58]). There was no significant association between studied risk factors and HDV infection. In the “isolated anti-HBc” profile group, prevalence of HDV was 4.6% and HBV-DNA had negative result in all patients with positive results for HDV. Although HDV had low prevalence in our area, it is vital to plan preventive strategies for HDV spread as well as HBV prevention. It is particularly important to suspect HDV infection in active HBV carriers to manage a particularly severe dual infection. HDV infection should be suspected even in negative HBsAg patients having “isolated anti-HBc” profile.
Journal title :
Hepatitis Monthly
Serial Year :
2016
Journal title :
Hepatitis Monthly
Record number :
2394973
Link To Document :
بازگشت