• Title of article

    Evaluation of Condylar Position after Orthognathic Surgery for Treatment of Class II Vertical Maxillary Excess and Mandibular Deficiency by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

  • Author/Authors

    Tabrizi، Reza نويسنده Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , , Shahidi ، Shoaleh نويسنده Biomaterial Research Center, Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Scienc-es, Shiraz, Iran. , , Bahramnejad ، Emad نويسنده Postgraduate of Maxillofacial Surgery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. , , Arabion ، Hamid Reza نويسنده Dept. of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. ,

  • Issue Information
    فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 53 سال 2016
  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    318
  • To page
    325
  • Abstract
    Statement of the Problem: In orthognathic surgeries, proper condylar position is one of the most important factors in postoperative stability. Knowing the condylar movement after orthognathic surgery can help preventing postoperative instabilities. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the condylar positional changes after Le Fort I maxillary superior repositioning along with mandibular advancement by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 22 subjects who had class II skeletal malocclusion along with vertical maxillary excess. Subjects underwent maxillary superior repositioning (Le Fort I osteotomy) along with mandibular advancement. The CBCT images were taken a couple of days before the surgery (T0), and one month (T1) and 9 months (T2) after the surgery. The condyles positions were determined from the most superior point of the condyle to three distances including the deepest point of the glenoid fossa, the most anterior-inferior point of the articular eminence, and the most superior point of the external auditory meatus in the sagittal plane. Results: The mean mandibular advancement was 4.33±2.1 mm and the mean maxillary superior repositioning was 4.66±0.3 mm. The condyles displaced inferiorly, anteriorly, and laterally between T0 and T1. They were repositioned approximately in the initial position in T2. No correlation was observed between the mandibular and maxillary movement and the condylar positions. Conclusion: The condyles displaced in the inferior-anterior-lateral position one month after the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination with the maxillary Le Fort I superior repositioning. It seems that the condyles adapted approximately in their initial position nine months after the surgeries. Keywords ? Mandible ? Condyle ? CBCT ? Sagittal Osteotomy ? Vertical Maxillary Excess;
  • Journal title
    Journal of Dentistry :Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
  • Serial Year
    2016
  • Journal title
    Journal of Dentistry :Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
  • Record number

    2395765