• Title of article

    Which technique is better for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation? External rotation or Milch method. A review of literature

  • Author/Authors

    -، - نويسنده Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran Mohammad Jafari Chokan, Niaz , -، - نويسنده Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran Reihani, Hamidreza , -، - نويسنده Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran Pishbin, Elham

  • Issue Information
    فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2016
  • Pages
    3
  • From page
    163
  • To page
    165
  • Abstract
    -
  • Abstract
    Anterior shoulder dislocation is the most common joint dislocation in human body. Many methods are traditionally described for reduction of shoulder dislocation. Most of these techniques are painful to patients and may be associated with further injury. An ideal method should be easy, effective, and less painful, not associated with iatrogenic complications and should be easy to teach and learn. Among different methods of reduction, external rotation and Milch methods are more popular. Both methods are found to be atraumatic, relatively painless and can be performed without anesthesia. In this article, we aimed to review the literatures regarding these two methods of reduction and comparing their success rate and outcome. We reviewed the literature to find articles related to reduction of anterior shoulder dislocations applying one of two techniques described above. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar. In total, 46 articles were found, of them 17 articles -which mainly focused on anterior shoulder dislocation reduction by means of two above methods-were included in this review. The results showed that both techniques were effective, safe, relatively painless, and were well tolerated with no complications, but the external rotation method was superior.
  • Journal title
    Reviews in Clinical Medicine
  • Serial Year
    2016
  • Journal title
    Reviews in Clinical Medicine
  • Record number

    2395972