Title of article :
Age as A Predictor of Embryo Quality Regardless of The Quantitative Ovarian Response
Author/Authors :
Scheffer، Juliano Brum. نويسنده Brazilian Institute of Assisted Reproduction, Belo Horizonte, Brazil , , Scheffer، Bruno Brum. نويسنده Brazilian Institute of Assisted Reproduction, Belo Horizonte, Brazil , , Carvalho، Rafaela Friche de نويسنده Brazilian Institute of Assisted Reproduction, Belo Horizonte, Brazil , , Rodrigues، Joyce نويسنده Brazilian Institute of Assisted Reproduction, Belo Horizonte, Brazil , , Grynberg، Michael نويسنده Department of Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Jean Verdier (AP-HP), University Paris XIII, and INSERM, Paris, France , , Mendez Lozano، Daniel H. نويسنده School of Medicine, Tecnol?gico de Monterrey and Center for Reproductive Medicine CREASIS San Pedro Monterrey, México ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 41 سال 2017
Abstract :
Background: One determining factor of a successful in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle
is embryo quality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate associations of embryo
quality and reserve markers like age, FSH and AMH.
Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, 120 infertile women, aged 21-44
years, undergoing routine exploration during an unstimulated cycle preceding assisted
reproductive technology (ART) at our center were studied prospectively, from February
2011 to December 2014. Descriptive parameters and patient characteristics were reported
as mean (SD) or median (range) depending on the distribution. Student’s t test was performed
for continuous variables, Wilcoxon and Pearson’s Test were used for not distributed
variables and Fisher’s Test was performed for categorical variables. P < 0.05 was
considered statistically significant.
Results: Overall, at the time of investigation, patients had a mean age of 33.03 ± 4.15
years old. On cycle day three, serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) level was 3.50
± 1.54 ng/mL, serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level was 6.29 ± 1.53 mUI/
mL, at baseline, women had 16.57 ± 7.0 antral follicles. The mean of collected oocytes
was 11.80 ± 5.25, embryo I+II was 2.46 ± 2.11. A greater number of embryos I+II was
observed in young patients. By evaluating 120 patients, a significant relationship was
observed between age and FSH (r=0.24, P=0.01), age with AMH (r=-0.22, P=0.02), age
with collected oocytes (r=-0.23, P=0.03) and age with embryo I+II (r=-0.22, P=0.03).
A significant relationship was also observed between antral follicle count (AFC) and
AMH (r=0.29, P=0.01), AFC and the number of transferred embryo (r=-0.18, P=0.03),
AFC and total dose of the drugs (r=-0.23, P=0.03). Significant relationship of FSH with
total dose of drugs (r=0.19, P=0.02) was also observed. In addition, we determined
significant relationships between AMH and the number of collected oocytes (r=0.38,
P=0.01), AMH and the number of metaphase II oocytes (r= 0.35, P=0.01), AMH and
the number of embryo (r=0.19, P=0.04) as well as AMH and total dose of the drugs
(r=-0.25, P=0.01).
Conclusion: Commonly used clinical markers of ovarian reserve are reflection of the
ovarian reserve, while the outcome measurements of ART and age are the best predictors
of embryo quality.
Journal title :
International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
Journal title :
International Journal of Fertility and Sterility