Title of article
Attachment Styles and Self-Efficacy in Blind and Non-blind Female High School Students
Author/Authors
Alsadat Makkiyan، Raziyeh نويسنده Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran. Alsadat Makkiyan, Raziyeh , Malekitabar، Mahmoud نويسنده Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran. Malekitabar, Mahmoud , Farahbakhsh، Kumars نويسنده Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran. Farahbakhsh, Kumars
Issue Information
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 16 سال 2016
Pages
12
From page
237
To page
248
Abstract
Objective: The present study aimed at investigating the relationship between attachment styles and self-efficacy in blind and non-blind female high school students in Tehran.
Methods: The statistical population consisted of all female students studying in grades one or two in Tehran girl’s high schools, in the academic year 2014. The study design was causal-comparative, conducted on 120 subjects consisting of 60 blind girls selected through convenient sampling method and 60 non-blind girls selected through randomized clustering sampling method. Data were collected through two questionnaires of attachment styles of Collins and Read (1990) (RAAS) and self-efficacy scale (SEQ-C) of Muris. To analyze the data, descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (multivariate analysis of variance) were used.
Results: The study results indicated a significant difference between blind and non-blind students’ efficacy and attachment styles. Avoidance attachment style as well as emotional, social, and public efficacy of these two groups revealed no significant difference. Moreover, the results indicated a significant difference between anxiety attachment style and emotional, social, and public efficacy of these two groups (P>0.05). Finally, a significant difference was observed between secure attachment style and emotional, social, and general efficacy of blind and non-blind students.
Conclusion: The blind and non-blind students are significantly different with regard to anxiety and secure attachment styles. However, their emotional, social, and academic self- efficacy seems to be the same. Although there was a significant difference between blind and non-blind students with regard to attachment styles, a significant association was seen between different dimensions of self-efficacy of blind and non-blind students (P<0.05).
Journal title
Practice in Clinical Psychology
Serial Year
2016
Journal title
Practice in Clinical Psychology
Record number
2399273
Link To Document