• Title of article

    A Cost-Utility Analysis of Different Antiviral Medicine Regimens in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection

  • Author/Authors

    Alavian، Seyed-Moayed نويسنده , , Nikfar، Shekoufeh نويسنده Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran Nikfar, Shekoufeh , Kebriaeezadeh، Abbas نويسنده , , Lotfi، Farhad نويسنده Faculty of Health Management and information Sciences, Tehran university of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , , Sanati، Ehsan نويسنده Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , , Rezaei Hemami، Mohsen نويسنده School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , , Keshavarz، Khosro نويسنده Department of Health Economic School of Management and Information Sciences Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran ,

  • Issue Information
    ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2016
  • Pages
    10
  • From page
    1
  • To page
    10
  • Abstract
    Despite the introduction of new drug regimens with high effectiveness for the hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients, especially in HCV genotype 1, no cost-effectiveness study on the selection of the superior drug strategy in Iran has been conducted yet. This study is aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the three drug regimens of pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PR), sofosbuvir (SOF) + PR and ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in patients with HCV genotype 1 in Iran in the year 2014. A Markov micro-simulation model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the three drug strategies for a cohort of 10000 patients. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were extracted from published studies. Cost data was estimated through the review of medical records and obtaining experts opinion. The results showed that the SOF + PR drug compared with PR had a lower cost and was more effective, but compared with the LDV/SOF, in spite of its lower cost, it was less efficient. The QALY values obtained for PR, SOF + PR and LDV/SOF, respectively, were 10.98, 12.08 and 12.28 and their costs were $ 41,741, $ 7,676 and $ 46,993. Moreover, the results obtained from acceptability curves showed that SOF + PR were the most cost-effective treatment for thresholds below $ 45,270 PPP. The use of SOF + PR regimen or LDV/SOF can significantly reduce the incidence of complications associated with the disease. For example, short and long-term outcomes are better than the current drug regimens for HCV genotype 1 patients in all stages of the disease.
  • Journal title
    Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal
  • Serial Year
    2016
  • Journal title
    Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal
  • Record number

    2399743