Title of article :
A 5-Fr Externalized Nephroureteral Catheter as the Sole Protective Device
for Pediatric Pyeloplasty: The Experiences of 142 Patients
Author/Authors :
Mollaeian، Mansour نويسنده , , Ghavami-Adel، Maryam نويسنده Department of Pediatric Surgery, Tehran University of
Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , , Eskandari، Farid نويسنده Department of Pediatric Surgery, Tehran University of
Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , , Mollaeian، Arash نويسنده General physician, Tehran, IR Iran ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2016
Abstract :
Background Pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
correction is a common procedure, but the optimal method for protective
diversion after pyeloplasty is still a matter of debate. Objectives
Here, we present our clinical trial experience using a single
percutaneous externalized nephroureteral (NU) 5-Fr catheter (infant
feeding tube) with multiple side holes as the sole instrument of
drainage to provide a protective mechanism. Materials and Methods In
this prospective study, we analyzed the charts of 142 patients who
underwent pyeloplasty from August 2001 through October 2008. We used a
single externalized NU 5-Fr catheter with multiple side holes for
postoperative upper tract diversion. The catheter was removed in the
office after 10 - 14 days. Complications from the use of this catheter,
including poor catheter function, premature dislodgement, urinary tract
infection, leakage, urinoma, and anastomotic stenosis, were evaluated.
The operations were performed by two surgeons at two separate centers.
Results In all, 148 pyeloplasty procedures were performed on 142
patients. The mean hospital stay length was 2 (1 - 3) days. A contrast
study through a catheter demonstrated excellent drainage with no leakage
in all patients. Immediately after catheter removal, febrile urinary
tract infection and transient obstructive symptoms and signs occurred in
15 patients. Conclusions Using a percutaneous externalized NU 5-Fr
catheter was sufficient as a protective measure after open pyeloplasty.
It costs less than other diverting systems, such as DJ, and can be
removed in the office. Therefore, it can be a safe and cost effective
procedure, especially in developing countries where cystoscopic set ups
are not readily available. There were only a few notable complications.
Journal title :
Iranian Journal of Pediatrics
Journal title :
Iranian Journal of Pediatrics