Author/Authors :
Hekmatian ، Ehsan نويسنده Assistant Professor, Department of Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Isfahan, Iran Hekmatian , Ehsan , Ghaffari، Roshanak نويسنده Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial
Radiology, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University Khorasgan
Branch, Isfahan, IR Iran , , Toghyani، Mohammad نويسنده Dentist, IR Iran , , Karbasi Kheir، Mitra نويسنده Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, IR Iran ,
Abstract :
Jaws spiral tomography and panoramic radiography have wide
applications in dentistry, and the parotid gland is one of the most
sensitive organs of the head and neck. The aim of this study was to
evaluate and compare the parotid-absorbed dose in spiral tomography and
panoramic radiographs using a thermoluminescent dosimeter. A radiation
analog dosimetry phantom was placed in a Cranex Tome radiograph device,
and a parotid absorbed dose was measured in both techniques.
Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed bilaterally in the parotid
region (on the tube side and the opposite side). Spiral tomography
dosimetry was done for the upper and lower jaws in the anterior and
posterior regions. Each region contained four slices of 2 mm and four
slices of 4 mm in thickness. The results were analyzed by a Wilcoxon
test. For the tube side parotid, the average absorbed doses in spiral
tomography of the anterior and posterior parts of the maxilla and
mandible, with the 2 mm slice thickness, were 1.70/1.40 and 1.65/1.60
mGy, respectively. The average absorbed doses with the 4mm slices were
1.65/1.70 and 1.75/1.57 mGy, respectively. For the opposite parotid, the
average absorbed dose in spiral tomography of the anterior and posterior
parts of the maxilla and mandible, with the 2 mm slice thickness, were
1.40/1.30 and 1.40/1.67 mGy, respectively. The average absorbed doses
with the 4mm slices were 1.50/1.66 and 1.40/1.50 mGy, respectively. The
average absorbed dose of the panoramic radiograph was 1.40 mGy. There
was no statistically significant difference in the parotid absorbed dose
between spiral tomography and a panoramic radiograph (P value = 0.18).
The overall results of this study were similar to other
studies.