Author/Authors :
Rahmani Maryam نويسنده Fertility and Infertility Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbass, Iran. , Ahmadinejad Nasrin نويسنده Department of Radiology, Advanced Diagnostic and
Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini
Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran,
Iran , Alikhassi Afsaneh نويسنده Department of Radiology, Cancer Institute of Tehran, Tehran, Iran Alikhassi Afsaneh , Akbari Sona نويسنده Department of Radiology, Tehran University of Medical
Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Roozafzai Farzin نويسنده Department of Radiology, Tehran University of Medical
Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Alikhassy Habibabadi Zahra نويسنده Department of Surgery, John Hopkins School of Medicine,
Baltimore, Maryland
Abstract :
Background No information has been published on the effectiveness
of digital non-diagnostic opportunistic screening mammography in Iran
that is measured by recall rate as one of its indices. Objectives In
this longitudinal study, we measured recall rate of non-diagnostic
mammography at a tertiary referral university hospital and made a
comparison with reported international data. Methods We examined 9395
digital mammograms performed in 2014 - 2015 from which, 2930 were the
first-time and 6465 were subsequent mammography. The patients were
referred to the university hospital by their clinicians during annual
check-ups while none of them had any chief complaint. The mean age was
49 years. We calculated recall rate, sensitivity, specificity, and
cancer detection rate. Results Breast cancer was diagnosed in 80
patients. Recall rates were 29% for the first-time and 22% for
subsequent mammography, and the overall rate of cancer incidence was 8.5
per 1000 mammograms (80/9395) with specificity of 75.9%, sensitivity of
97.5%, PPV of 3.4%, and NPV of 99%. Conclusions The recall rate was much
higher in this setting than the acceptable range reported in literature.
However, the sensitivity and detection rate were higher; thus, the
higher recall rate could be due to some differences in the patient
population such as being at younger ages and higher risks.