Title of article
Morphologic Evaluation of Ductus Diverticulum Using Multi - Detector Computed Tomography: Comparison with Traumatic Pseudoaneurysm of the Aortic Isthmus
Author/Authors
Hyung Ann Jun نويسنده Department of Radiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea , Young Kim Eun نويسنده Department of Radiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea , Mi Jeong Yu نويسنده Department of Radiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea , Ho Kim Jeong نويسنده Department of Radiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea , Sik Kim Hyung نويسنده Department of Radiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea , Choi Hye-Young نويسنده Department of Radiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
Pages
5
From page
1
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate morphologic variations at the aortic
isthmus with particular attention to ductus diverticulum, a mimicker of
traumatic pseudoaneurysm, and to describe differences using Computed
Tomography (CT) images. Patients and Methods From December 2013 to
December 2014, patients who underwent a chest CT examination after blunt
trauma at our emergency department were included. Aortic isthmus
morphologies were evaluated using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and
maximum intensity projection (MIP) images as follows. Type I -concave
contour, type II -convexity without a discrete bulge, or type III -a
discrete focal bulge (defined as ductus diverticulum). Results After
excluding 11 cases of traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the aortic isthmus, a
total of 432 trauma patients (mean age = 47.1 ± 19.1 years, number of
males = 318) were evaluated for aortic isthmus morphology, and
classified as follows; type I (n = 240, 55.6%), type II (n = 157,
36.3%), and type III (n = 35, 8.1%). As compared with traumatic
pseudoaneurysm (n = 11), ductus diverticulum had a smaller vertical
diameter (5.5 ± 1.3 mm vs. 11.2 ± 2.7 mm, P < 0.001), a broader
base (14.9 ± 4.1 mm vs. 8.8 ± 4.5 mm, P < 0.001), a smoother
margin (97.1% vs. 27.3%, P < 0.001), and formed obtuse angle with
the aortic wall. Furthermore, ductus diverticulum was not associated
with the presence of a dissection flap or hemomediastinum. Conclusion
Ductus diverticulum, a mimicker of traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the
aortic isthmus, is a frequently observed anatomic variant during CT
examinations. Familiarity with its CT imaging findings could avoid it
being confused with traumatic pseudoaneurysm in blunt trauma patients.
Journal title
Astroparticle Physics
Serial Year
2016
Record number
2409107
Link To Document