Author/Authors :
Aribas Bilgin Kadri نويسنده Department of Radiology, Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey , Aribas Ozge نويسنده Faculty of Science, University of Ankara, Ankara, Turkey , Tiken Ramazan نويسنده Department of Radiology, A.Y. Ankara Oncology Education
and Research Hospital, 06200 Ankara, Turkey , Uylar Tugba نويسنده Department of Radiology, A.Y. Ankara Oncology Education
and Research Hospital, 06200 Ankara, Turkey , Akdulum Ismail نويسنده Department of Radiology, A.Y. Ankara Oncology Education
and Research Hospital, 06200 Ankara, Turkey , Turker Ibrahim نويسنده Department of Medical Oncology, A.Y. Ankara Oncology
Education and Research Hospital, 06200 Ankara, Turkey , Yildiz Aksoy Merve نويسنده Department of Radiology, A.Y. Ankara Oncology Education
and Research Hospital, 06200 Ankara, Turkey , Seber Turgut نويسنده Department of Radiology, A.Y. Ankara Oncology Education
and Research Hospital, 06200 Ankara, Turkey , Sahin Burcu نويسنده Department of Radiology, A.Y. Ankara Oncology Education
and Research Hospital, 06200 Ankara, Turkey , Uzun Haci نويسنده Department of Radiology, A.Y. Ankara Oncology Education
and Research Hospital, 06200 Ankara, Turkey , Caglar Emrah نويسنده Department of Radiology, A.Y. Ankara Oncology Education
and Research Hospital, 06200 Ankara, Turkey
Abstract :
Background Studies have reported factors affecting the efficacy of
subcutaneous venous chest port catheters placed into jugular or
subclavian veins using a radiological technique. There is ongoing debate
for this efficacy in these series. Objectives To examine factors on
patency times, including complications of subcutaneous venous chest port
insertions, using ultrasonography guidance in 1,408 patients over a
long-term follow-up. Patients and Methods Between April 2009 and March
2014, subcutaneous venous chest ports were placed in 1,408 patients, 574
women and 834 men (mean age, 55.4 ± 12.1 years). Factors affecting the
port patency were examined. Age, gender, access, malignancy site, and
coagulation parameters were variables. A multivariable Cox regression
test was used. Additionally, the successes were compared by univariate
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results Fifty-seven patients underwent
port removal because of complications. Complication due to catheter
patency time, as number of specific complication per 100 catheter days
divided by total patency days shown in parenthesis. Ports were explanted
in 29 patients because of thrombosis (0.0054), in nine patients because
of infection (0.0017), in eight patients because of catheter malposition
(0.0015), in five patients because of bleeding (0.0009), in five
patients because of skin necrosis with infection (0.0009) and one
patient because of a port reservoir flip-over (0.0002), of a total of 57
patients (0.0107). The patency was similar in the two central veins (P =
0.230). No factor was significant except for the malignancy site (P =
0.002). The malignancy site and gender were significant factors for
thrombosis. Port removal was significantly higher in extremities
involving two regions and in female patients. Conclusions Patency was
not different between two venous access groups. The malignancy site was
the only significant factor for success.