Author/Authors :
Dellal Fatma Dilek نويسنده Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ataturk
Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey , Baser Husniye نويسنده Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ataturk
Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey , Arpaci Dilek نويسنده Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Bulent Ecevit
University, Zonguldak, Turkey , Tam Abbas Ali نويسنده Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Faculty of
Medicine, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey , Ozdemir Didem نويسنده Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Faculty of
Medicine, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey , Kilicarslan Aydan نويسنده Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Yildirim
Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey , Dumlu Ersin Gurkan نويسنده Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Yildirim
Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey , Ersoy Reyhan نويسنده Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Faculty of
Medicine, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey , Cakir Bekir نويسنده Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Faculty of
Medicine, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
Abstract :
Background There are ultrasonography (US) features suggested to be
associated with a higher risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules. However,
exophytic appearence of thyroid nodules has not been studied previously.
Objectives To evaluate US features, and cytological and
histopathological findings in exophytic thyroid nodules. Patients and
Methods Patients with an exophytic thyroid nodule who underwent fine
needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) between January and July 2015 were
evaluated prospectively. Demographical data, US features, and cytology
results were noted and histopathological findings were determined in
operated patients. The results were compared with non-exophytic nodules
of age and sex matched patients. Results Data of 253 exophytic nodules
in 247 patients and 529 non-exophytic nodules in 357 patients were
analyzed. Hypoechogenity, mixed texture, and absence of peripheral halo
were significantly higher in exophytic nodules (P < 0.001, P
< 0.001, and P = 0.018, respectively). Nondiagnostic, atypia of
undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance
and suspicious for malignancy cytology results were significantly higher
in exophytic nodules (P = 0.002, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001
respectively). 6.7% of exophytic nodules and 1.9% of non-exophytic
nodules had malignant cytology (P = 0.001). Histopathologically, 35
(47.9%) of 73 exophytic nodules and 18 (24.3%) of 74 non-exophytic
nodules were malignant (P < 0.01). Capsular invasion was higher
in the malignant exophytic group (53.5% vs 14.3%, P = 0.027). US
features other than hypoechoic pattern which was higher in the malignant
group were similar in benign and malignant exophytic nodules.
Conclusions Exophytic nodules seem to carry a higher rate of malignancy
both cytologically and histopathologically. Suspicous US features except
hypoechoic pattern were not higher in malignant compared to benign
exophytic nodules.