Author/Authors :
Mohammadzadeh Rezaei Maryam نويسنده Dental Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Ghelich Oghli Mostafa نويسنده Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Advanced Medical Technology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Mohammad Zadeh Ali نويسنده Department of Radiology, Shaheed Rajaei Cardiovascular, Medical and Research Center, Tehran, Iran , Mohammadzadeh Vahid نويسنده Medical Student, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Mohammadzadeh Vahid , Kadivar Sakineh نويسنده Department of Ophthalmology, Amiralmomenin Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. Kadivar Sakineh
Abstract :
Background Left ventricle segmentation plays an essential role in
computation of cardiac functional parameters such as ventricular end
diastolic and end systolic volumes, ejection fraction, myocardial mass,
and wall thickness and also wall motion analysis. Manual segmentation is
also time consuming and suffers from inter and intra observer
variability. Several approaches have been proposed that segment the left
ventricle (LV) by automatic and semi-automatic methods, but the problem
is still open due to the huge shape variety of the left ventricle and
motion artifact. Materials and Methods A robust semi-automatic approach
is hereby presented for addressing the left ventricle segmentation
problem. The presented method combines region information of the left
ventricle with gradient and edge information in a graph framework. The
LV region information is captured using our previously presented region
growing method and is embedded into livewire framework. Results The
modified livewire that is presented here shows a great success in
quantitative criteria over the publically available MICCAI 2009 left
ventricle segmentation challenge database that contains 45 normal and
abnormal cases. We have computed dice metric (DM) and average
perpendicular distance (APD) for the proposed method and it outperformed
the state of the art results over all papers that used the same
database. Validation metrics, dice metric and average perpendicular
distance were computed as 0.95 mm and 1.48 mm versus those of 0.87 -
0.93 mm and 1.76 - 1.81 mm obtained by other methods, respectively.
Conclusion Using semi-automatic approaches for cardiac segmentation
yields satisfying results and this is because of incorporating
radiologist’s experiences into the segmentation procedure. Maintaining
image information to reduce user interaction is our goal for further
researches.