Abstract :
The present study explored the rhetorical representation of authorial identity signaled by interactive/interactional meta-discourse strategies and integral/non-integral citation patterns in international and Iranian local research article discussion sections. The study also examined variation in meta-discourse and citation resources across three sub-disciplines of Language Testing, English Language Teaching, and Discourse Analysis. To this end, a representative sample of 60 discussion sections of articles published in three prestigious international journals and three well-accredited Iranian local journals was collected. The comparisons revealed that Iranian local articles used a greater number of interactive meta-discourse strategies, whereas international articles tended to employ more interactional meta-discourse markers. In the interaction between authorial identity and citation perspectives, it was demonstrated that Iranian local articles employed more integral citation resources, while their international counterparts utilized more non-integral citation patterns. These differences can be attributed to some other factors elaborated on in the paper Furthermore, the findings showed sub-disciplinary variation in the use of interactional meta-discourse strategies and non-integral citation patterns in international RAs. This can be attributed to their distinctive communicative purposes, target readership, scope of investigation, and final research products. The study concludes with some implications for post-graduate students to equip themselves with both macro-level generic and micro-level discoursal properties required for writing research article discussion sections, and, accordingly manifesting their authorial identity.
