Author/Authors :
Bigdeli, Shoaleh Center for Educational Research in Medical Sciences (CERMS) - Department of Medical Education - Faculty of Medicine - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Pakpour, Vahid Hematology and oncology Research center - Students Research Committee - Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran , Aalaa, Maryam Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center - Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Shekarabi, Robabeh Faculty Member - MSc in Nursing - Center for Nursing Care Research of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Sanjari, Mahnaz Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center - Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Haghani, Hamid Faculty Member of School of Public Health - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Mehrdad, Neda Elderly Health Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Educational clinical environment has an important role in nursing students' learning.
Any difference between actual and expected clinical environment will decrease nursing students’
interest in clinical environments and has a negative correlation with their clinical performance.
Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study is an attempt to compare nursing students' perception
of the actual and expected status of clinical environments in medical-surgical wards.
Participants of the study were 127 bachelor nursing students of Iran University of Medical Sciences
in the internship period. Data gathering instruments were a demographic questionnaire (including
sex, age, and grade point average), and the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI) originally
developed by Professor Chan (2001), in which its modified Farsi version (Actual and Preferred
forms) consisting 42 items, 6 scales and 7 items per scale was used. Descriptive and inferential statistics
(t-test, paired t-test, ANOVA) were used for data analysis through SPSS version 16.
Results: The results indicated that there were significant differences between the preferred and actual
form in all six scales. In other word, comparing with the actual form, the mean scores of all
items in the preferred form were higher. The maximum mean difference was in innovation and the
highest mean difference was in involvement scale.
Conclusion: It is concluded that nursing students do not have a positive perception of their actual
clinical teaching environment and this perception is significantly different from their perception of
their expected environment.