Author/Authors :
Kashaninasab, Fatemeh Rasoul Akram Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Alavi, Kaveh Mental Health Research Center - Psychiatric Department - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Farhadi, Mohammad HEAD & Neck Surgery Department - Research center of Otolaryngology - Rasoul Akram Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Salehi, Mansour Mental Health Research Center - Psychiatric Department - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Ghaleh Bandi, Mir Farhad Mental Health Research Center - Psychiatric Department - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is valuable, but it is time-consuming and expensive. Appropriate
screening instruments help clinicians select high-risk individuals for further investigations. In the present study, we compared 4
popular instruments used in screening OSAS including Berlin, STOP, STOP-BANG questionnaires, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale
(ESS).
Methods: A total of 250 individuals, who referred to Sleep Laboratory of Shoorideh Hospital (Tehran, Iran) for polysomnography
during May 2015 to November 2015, were recruited for this cross-sectional study. In addition to taking history and physical examination,
4 screening instruments including Berlin, STOP, STOP-BANG questionnaires, and ESS were completed. Diagnosis of OSAS was established
using apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in 3 categories of mild, moderate, and severe.
Results: Severe OSAS was diagnosed in 159 (63.6%), moderate OSAS in 43 (17.2%), and mild OSAS in 41 (16.4%) of the participants,
moreover, AHI was within normal range in the other 7 (2.8%). To diagnose OSAS with any severity, Berlin questionnaire was a
preferable instrument, with a sensitivity of 79.8% and specificity of 71.4%, considering the cut-point value of 3.5. In addition, in cases
of severe OSAS, Berlin questionnaire showed superiority over other instruments, with a sensitivity of 80.5% and specificity of 61.5%
using the cut-point value of 3.5.
Conclusion: None of the 4 instruments are ideal to predict OSAS. However, considering the simplicity and availability of the instruments,
Berlin and STOP-BANG questionnaires had maximum diagnostic values that helped us distinguish OSAS and severe OSAS,
respectively.