Author/Authors :
Hosseini Golkar, Mostafa Faculty of Management - University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , Ghazinoory, Sepehr Department of Information Management - Faculty of Human Sciences - Modarres University, Tehran, Iran , Saghafi, Fatemeh Faculty of Management - University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , Eivazi, Mohammad-Rahim Department of Futures Studies - Imam-Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran , Poursheikhali, Atousa Institute of Futures Studies in Health - Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran , Dehnavieh, Reza Institute of Futures Studies in Health - Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Scenario is the primary method in futures studies, and thus its improper use can undermine the credibility and claims
of the results. There are many scenario types, and here we aimed at understanding whether these scenarios are being used properly in
the health field.
Methods: In this study, a combination method was used in 3 phases, and 8 + 2 steps were considered to accommodate the needs of
the health sector with capabilities of the main types of scenarios. One of the appropriate methods of futures studies was used at each
step.
Results: Scenario planning has evolved along with futures studies paradigms. Trend-based scenarios, intuitive logic, and structural
analysis approaches have had the most use in futures scenarios and health section. Quantitative techniques, which are close to the positivist
paradigm, have been most widely used; however, participatory methods of futures studies paradigm have been used the least in
the health sector.
Conclusions: Health scenario writing in its current state is targeting short- to medium- term futures and does not respond to all requirements.
Thus, other backup methods should also be considered.
Keywords :
Survey , Methodology , Types of Scenarios , Health Section , Futures Studies