Title of article :
Transseptal Approach versus Left Atrial Approach to Mitral Valve: A Propensity Score Matching Study
Author/Authors :
Rezahosseini, Omid Tehran Heart Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Rezaei, Mohamadreza Tehran Heart Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Ahmadi Tafti, Hossein Tehran Heart Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Jalali, Arash Tehran Heart Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Bina, Payvand Tehran Heart Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Ghiasi, Atefeh Tehran Heart Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Karimi, Abbasali Tehran Heart Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Abbasi, Kiomars Tehran Heart Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Shirzad, Mahmood Tehran Heart Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Davoodi, Saeed Tehran Heart Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Salehi Omran, Abbas Tehran Heart Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Background: Many patients with mitral valve diseases need surgical procedures for the repair or replacement of their
mitral valve. There is a great deal of controversy over the outcomes of the transseptal (TS) and left atrial (LA) approaches to
the mitral valve. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of each approach more accurately by eliminating the possible biases in
case selection and matching.
Methods: This retrospective study included patients who had surgery for mitral valve diseases via either the TS approach
or the LA approach between 2004 and 2011 in Tehran Heart Center. Patients with surgical approaches other than the TS
and LA were excluded. To control for the confounding effects, a propensity score matching technique was applied and the
patients were matched for 14 demographic and preoperative variables. After the selection of controls, the effect of the TS
approach (163 patients) versus the LA approach (652 patients) on the outcomes was presented through odds ratio (OR) with
95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: The mean age of the patients was 53.15 ± 12.02 years in the TS group and 52.93 ± 13.56 years in the LA
group. Females comprised 119 (73.0%) patients in the TS group and 462 (70.9%) in the LA group. There was a significant
association in the prevalence of new postoperative atrial fibrillation in the two groups (OR = 1.539, 95%CI: 1.072-2.210; p
value = 0.019). Temporary pacemaker placement had no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p value
= 0.418). The TS patients had significantly longer pump (p value < 0.001) and cross-clamp (p value < 0.001) times. The
mortality rate was 4.1% (27 patients) in the LA group and 6.1% (10 patients) in the TS group (p value = 0.274).
Conclusion: In our study population, the TS approach was associated with higher pump and cross-clamp times as well as
risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation, but it did not increase the rates of permanent pacemaker placement, re-operations,
and mortality.
J Teh Univ Heart Ctr 2015;10(4):188-193
This paper should be cited as: Rezahosseini O, Rezaei M, Ahmadi Tafti SH, Jalali A, Bina P, Ghiasi A, Karimi A, Abbasi K, Shirzad
M, Davoodi S, Salehi Omran A. Transseptal Approach versus Left Atrial Approach to Mitral Valve: A Propensity Score Matching Study. J
Teh Univ Heart Ctr 2015;10(4):188-193.
Keywords :
Atrial fibrillation , Heart atria , Heart septum , Mitral valve
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics