Title of article :
Clinical Outcome of Ream Versus Unream Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures
Author/Authors :
Bagheri, Farshid Orthopedic and Trauma Research Center - Department of Orthopedic Surgery - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran , Sharifi, Reza Orthopedic and Trauma Research Center - Department of Orthopedic Surgery - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran , Mirzadeh, Navid Reza Orthopedic and Trauma Research Center - Department of Orthopedic Surgery - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran , Hootkani, Alireza Orthopedic and Trauma Research Center - Department of Orthopedic Surgery - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran , Ebrahimzadeh, Mohamad Hosein Orthopedic and Trauma Research Center - Department of Orthopedic Surgery - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran , Ashraf, Hami Orthopedic and Trauma Research Center - Department of Orthopedic Surgery - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran
Pages :
4
From page :
432
To page :
435
Abstract :
Background: Stabilization of fractures with an intramedullary nail is a widespread technique in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in adults; however, to ream or not to ream is still being debated. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to determine clinical results following unreamed versus ream intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. Patients and Methods: Between January 2008 and August 2009, 50 patients with femoral shaft fractures were treated with unreamed or reamed femoral nails in our clinic. From this prospective single centre study, 16 patients were excluded due to insufficient follow-up data. According to the AO classification, fractures in this study were either type A or B. Dynamic proximal locking was performed in all cases. The remaining 34 patients were divided into two groups of 17 with ream or unream nailing. During and after the operation, we evaluated some variables in whole series. Results: After statistical analyzes, we found that there were no differences in radiologic unio‎n time (P = 1) or full weight bearing time (P = 0.73) between ream and unream nailing. Nail breakage or iatrogenic fractures during nail insertion did not occur and we did not have any fat emboli in both groups but one secondary loss of reduction occurred in the unream group. Superficial infection after the operation was seen in one case which was treated successfully with antibiotics. In the ream group surgical time was about thirty minutes longer and differences were significant (P = 0.000). Patients had to pay more for ream nailing but the difference was not significant. We found no statistical difference between unio‎n time with or without reaming; on the other hand, there was significant increased operation length, blood loss and systemic changes in BP or So2 in the ream group versus the unream group. Conclusions: We advocate that unream nailing in traumatic femoral shaft fractures is a simple, safe and effective procedure with significant advantages, especially in multitrauma patients.
Keywords :
Femur , Femoral Fractures , Fracture Fixation , Intramedullary
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics
Serial Year :
2013
Record number :
2422297
Link To Document :
بازگشت