Author/Authors :
Khan, Lubna Department of Ophthalmology - Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India , Malukani, Kamal Department of Pathology - Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India , Malaiya, Siddharth Department of Ophthalmology - Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India , Yeshwante, Prashant Department of Pathology - Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India , Ishrat, Saba Department of Ophthalmology - Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India , Nandedkar, Shirish S Department of Pathology - Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
Abstract :
Purpose: To evaluate the role of fine needle aspiration (FNAC) as a diagnostic tool in cases of orbital and
ocular adnexal masses. Cytological findings were correlated with histopathological diagnosis wherever
possible.
Methods: FNAC was performed in 29 patients of different age groups presenting with orbital and ocular
adnexal masses. Patients were evaluated clinically and investigated by non‑invasive techniques before
fine needle aspiration of the masses. Smears were analyzed by a cytologist in all cases. Further, results of
cytology were compared with the histopathological diagnosis.
Results: The age of patients ranged from 1 to 68 years (mean: 29.79±19.29). There were 14 males and 15 females
with a male to female ratio of 0.93:1. Out of 29 cases, 26 aspirates were cellular. Cellularity was insufficient
in three (10.34%) aspirates. Out of 26 cellular aspirates, 11 were non‑neoplastic while 15 were neoplastic on
cytology. Subsequent histopathologic examination was done in 21/26 cases. Concordance rate of FNAC in
orbital and ocular adnexal mass lesions with respect to the precise histologic diagnosis was 90%.
Conclusion: When properly used in well‑indicated patients (in cases where a diagnosis cannot be made by
clinical and imaging findings alone), FNAC of orbital and periorbital lesions is an invaluable and suitable
adjunct diagnostic technique that necessitates close cooperation between the ophthalmologist and cytologist.
However, nondiagnostic aspirates may sometimes be obtained, and an inconclusive FNAC should not
always be ignored.