Author/Authors :
Khademi, Abbasali Dental Research Center - Department of Endodontics - Dental School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Zamani Naser, Asieh Dental Implants Research Center - Radiology Research Committee - Department of Radiology - Dental School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Bahreinian, Zahra Dental Implants Research Center - Radiology Research Committee - Department of Radiology - Dental School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Mehdizadeh, Mojdeh Dental Implants Research Center - Radiology Research Committee - Department of Radiology - Dental School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Najarian, Mojtaba Department of Radiology - Dental School, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnourd , Khazaei, Saber Dental Research Center - Department of Endodontics - Dental School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Abstract :
Introduction: The aim of this investigation was to evaluate root canal morphology of
maxillary first and second molars and also to assess the prevalence and morphology of the
second mesiobuccal canal (MB2) in these teeth, using cone-beam computed tomography
(CBCT). Methods and Materials: In this cross-sectional study, the total of 470 CBCT
images from the archive of Radiology Department of Isfahan University of Medical
Sciences (IUMS), Iran, was evaluated and 295 images were selected. The number of roots,
and canal configuration were determined based on Vertucci’s classification system. The
data was analyzed using SPSS 20, and P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Results: A total of 295 images from 295 patients (165 females and 130 males), including
389 maxillary first (197 right and 192 left) and 460 maxillary second (235 right and 225
left) molars were evaluated. The prevalence of MB2 canals were 70.2% and 43.4% in the
maxillary first and second molars, respectively. The most common type of Vertucci’s
classification was type II (53.1%), followed by type I. Conclusion: The second mesiobuccal
canal was present in almost two thirds of first and less than half of second molars. The
morphology and canal configuration of a maxillary molar can almost predict the
morphology of contralateral molar. However, it does not relate to the ipsilateral molar.
Keywords :
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Maxillary Molar , Mesiobuccal Canal , Root Canal Configuration