Author/Authors :
Karade, Priyatam Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics - Vasantdada Patil Dental College and Hospital - Kavalapur - Sangli, India , Chopade, Rutuja Bharati Deemed University Dental College and Hospital - Sangli, India , Patil, Suvarna Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics - Vasantdada Patil Dental College and Hospital - Kavalapur - Sangli, India , Hoshing, Upendra Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics - Vasantdada Patil Dental College and Hospital - Kavalapur - Sangli, India , Rao, Madhukar Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics - Vasantdada Patil Dental College and Hospital - Kavalapur - Sangli, India , Rane, Neha Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics - MGV’s KBH Dental College and Hospital - Panchwati - Nashik, India , Chopade, Aditi Private Practioner - Kolhapur, India , Kulkarni, Anish Private Practioner - Pune, India
Abstract :
Introduction: This in vitro study was designed to evaluate and compare different endodontic
irrigation and activation systems for removal of the intracanal smear layer. Methods and
Materials: Forty recently extracted, non-carious human intact single rooted premolars were
selected and divided into five groups (n=10) according to the root canal irrigation systems;
syringe and needle irrigation (CTR), sonic irrigation, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and
EndoVac irrigation system. All groups were prepared to #40 apical size with K-files. Each
sample was subjected to final irrigation by using four different irrigation/activation systems.
After splitting the samples, one half of each root was selected for examination under scanning
electron microscope (SEM). The irrigation systems were compared using the Fisher's exact test
with the level of significance set at 0.05. Results: The four groups did not differ from each other
in the coronal and mid-root parts of the canal. In the apical part of the canal none of the
methods could completely remove all the smear layer but EndoVac system showed significantly
better removal of smear layer and debris than the other methods. Conclusion: Within the
limitations of the present study, the EndoVac system cleaned the apical part of the canal more
efficiently than sonic, ultrasonic and syringe and needle irrigation.
Keywords :
EndoVac Irrigation System , Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation , Smear Layer , Sonic Irrigation System