Author/Authors :
Nazarian, Hamid Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences - School of Medicine - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Azad, Nahid Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences - School of Medicine - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Nazari, Leila Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Preventative Gynecology Research Center - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Piryaei, Abbas Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences - School of Medicine - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Heidari, Mohammad Hassan Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences - School of Medicine - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Masteri Farahani, Reza Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences - School of Medicine - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Karimi, Maryam Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Ghaffari Novin, Marefat Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Artificial oocyte activation (AOA) is a specialized method in assisted
reproductive technique (ART). According to increasing concern about using AOA, it
is necessary to evaluate sperm-borne oocyte activating factors (SOAFs) including
phospholipase C zeta (PLCζ). In this study, PLCζ before AOA was evaluated first
and then the impact of AOA on pre-implantation embryo development was investigated.
Methods: This prospective clinical trial enrolled couples subjected to ICSI. By evaluating
PLCζ, semen samples were categorized into two groups; I (Control) and II
(PLCζ deficient). Retrieved oocytes from partners were put into three categories:
control group (Injected with sperm from group I, n=113), group without AOA (Injected
with sperm from group II and no exposure to AOA, n=106), and group AOA
(Injected with sperm from group II and exposure to AOA, n=114). Finally, fertilization
results were compared via Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison
test. The p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Fertilization rate was significantly lower in the group without AOA compared
to control group (41.9±6.3 vs. 78.1±4.7, p<0.001). AOA improved fertilization
rate in group AOA compared to the group without AOA (69.5±3.9 vs. 41.9±6.3, p<
0.01); however, cleavage (91.7±2.8, 90.9±4.6, and 95.2±3.4, respectively) and embryo
quality (2.5±0.1, 2.3±0.2, and 2.4±0.2, respectively) scores were not substantially
different between groups of control, with and without AOA.
Conclusion: We showed that PLCζ can be considered as a good biomarker in evaluation
of oocyte activation capability. Further studies are required to establish the best
use of PLCζ as a biomarker in clinics.
Keywords :
Artificial oocyte activation , Biomarker , Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection , Phospholipase C zeta , Sperm