Title of article :
Comparison of the Short-Term Clinical Results of Epi-LASIK and Photorefractive Keratectomy with Mitomycin-C for Moderate to High Myopia
Author/Authors :
Hashemi, Hassan Noor Ophthalmology Research Center - Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran , Foudazi, Hamid Noor Ophthalmology Research Center - Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran , Miraftab, Mohammad Noor Ophthalmology Research Center - Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran , Khabazkhoob, Mehdi Noor Ophthalmology Research Center - Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran , Yekta, AbbasAli Refractive Errors Research Center - School of Paramedical Sciences - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
Abstract :
Purpose: To compare the postoperative results of Epi-LASIK and photorefractive
keratectomy-mitomycin (PRK-mitomycin) in patients with moderate to high myopia
Methods: For this double-blind clinical trial, samples were randomly selected among those subjects
above 20 years of age who were visited for myopia correction and had a spherical equivalent
between -4 to -8 D. We randomly performed PRK-mitomycin in one eye and Epi-LASIK in the other
eye of the patients. Refraction examinations, visual acuity (VA) measurements, contrast sensitivity
testing, and corneal examination were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. In the current
study, analysis was performed on 3- and 6-month data.
Results: Thirty-six eyes were studied. Six months after surgery, the mean spherical equivalent in
PRK-mitomycin and Epi-LASIK groups was 0 and -0.1 D, respectively (p=0.994). Six months after
surgery, 13 eyes had a spherical equivalent of 0±0.5 D in each group while one diopter of
ametropia was seen in 16 and 15 eyes in the PRK-mitomycin and Epi-LASIK groups, respectively.
Six months after surgery, one eye in the PRK-mitomycin group and two eyes in the Epi-LASIK
group lost 1 line of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Six months after surgery, 12 eyes in the
PRK-mitomycin group and nine eyes in the Epi-LASIK group had an uncorrected visual acuity
(UCVA) of 10/10. The safety index in the PRK-mitomycin and Epi-LASIK group was calculated to be
1.25 and 1.19, respectively (p=0.480). No haze was seen in the PRK-mitomycin group 6 months
after surgery while 2 cases in the Epi-LASIK group had haze grade 0.5. There was no significant
difference in contrast sensitivity between the two groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion: The two methods were similar in postoperative VA and refractive results. Since the
chance of haze formation in Epi-LASIK surgery without the application of mitomycin-C (MMC) is
similar to PRK with mitomycin, Epi-LASIK can be considered as an alternative to PRK with MMC
for the treatment of moderate to high myopia.
Keywords :
Safety Index , Corneal Haze , Epi-LASIK , Mitomycin , Photorefractive Keratectomy
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics