Title of article
Combined Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Celecoxib in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
Author/Authors
Mosleh Shirazi, MA Department of Radiotherapy - Shiraz University ofMedical Sciences, Shiraz , Ahmadloo, N Department of Radiotherapy - Shiraz University ofMedical Sciences, Shiraz , Nazer Mozaffari, MA Department of Radiotherapy - Shiraz University ofMedical Sciences, Shiraz , Mohammadianpanah, M Department of Radiotherapy - Shiraz University ofMedical Sciences, Shiraz , Omidvari, SH Department of Radiotherapy - Shiraz University ofMedical Sciences, Shiraz , Mosalaei, A Department of Radiotherapy - Shiraz University ofMedical Sciences, Shiraz
Pages
6
From page
419
To page
424
Abstract
Background: Locally advanced breast cancer is a presentation form of cancer with poor prognosis. The optimal
method of treatment for these cases remains unclear. In this trial, the role of low dose celecoxib combined with
neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer was evaluated.
Methods: Fifty women with pathologically proven locally advanced breast cancer were enrolled. All patients
received preoperative chemotherapy with CAF (Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, 5-FU 600
mg/m2) regimen. They were randomly assigned into two groups. The first group received oral celecoxib (100 mg
twice daily) concurrently with chemotherapy and the second group was offered placebo. Chemotherapy was
administered every three weeks and celecoxib continued until one week before the surgery. The patients received
an average of 3 months treatment. The size of breast mass was measured before each cycle of chemotherapy
by a caliper. The pathologic response rate was the primary endpoint of the study.
Results: In this trial, 50 patients were eligible, of whom 44 were evaluable. There were 25 patients in the celecoxib
group and 25 patients in the placebo arm. Two patients in each group developed metastasis during the
treatment course and two patients in group one could not tolerate celecoxib and quit it, so they were excluded
from the trial. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of partial or complete response (90.5% vs.
87.0%) between celecoxib and placebo groups. Histological type, grade and hormonal receptor were similar in
the two groups. No significant association was observed between menstrual status, size of mass at presentation
and response to celecoxib.
Conclusion: This study suggests that the use of celecoxib with a dose of 100 mg twice daily combined with
neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not improve response rate in locally advanced breast cancer.
Keywords
Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX- 2) inhibitor , Locally advanced breast cancer , Celecoxib , Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Journal title
Astroparticle Physics
Serial Year
2009
Record number
2431232
Link To Document